Ilizant is a fast supporter, with U-turn, Spikes, Taunt, Encore, Defog, and Knock Off all being useable. This is why I ended up giving it Magic Guard and Spikes, alleviating some of Bug's poor relationship with hazards. For a mono Bug type to stick out enough to be used on a mono Bug team, it needed to bring something significant to the table. : Defog, Spikes, Taunt, Calm Mind, Encore, Defend Order, Heal Order,Ĭompetitive use: Bug tends to run offensive, and it has multiple great physical megas, Quiver Dance users, and Sticky Web setters. When the Guardians of Alola intervened, only Solem was spared. Unfortunately, they squandered its power to control the weather on warfare. Pokedex: This pokemon was created and given life by an ancient civilation. Smart sacs, pressure, and revenge killing are the name of the game. It's quite the glass cannon otherwise, so while it's a volatile threat, it shouldn't be overpowered. Realistically Stealth Rock + one Flare Blitz kill will usually leave it too weak to switch in on Stealth Rock again. Is it broken?: Flare Blitz is extremely powerful in Sun, but also damn near suical with only 50 base HP. On Rock teams, a Specially-based mixed set will provide stronger special hits than anything else Rock has access to. Of course, Sun is quite beneficial to them too. Running a physically-based mixed set, its Rock, Ground, and Grass coverage will prove very valuable for Fire teams as well. On Fire teams, it will help smash past Fire-type checks on the opposing team in order to help its teammates clean up. But now I have to learn what's going on.Competitive use: Solem is a powerful wallbreaker, Sun setter, and Choice Scarfer. :) But it seems related, given the attribute helps. So I've had this in my head for decades, and now I'm uncertain as to what I was thinking. "If an object of static storage duration has initialization or aĭestructor with side effects, it shall not be eliminated even if itĪppears to be unused, except that a class object or its copy may be Reviewing the standard, the wording seems like I got it exactly backwards: Static constexpr Function f1 _attribute_((used)) = &Type::get It can "prove" those class instantiations are not used, and so the side effects are lost.įor a non-standard solution, but one that works on g++ (and presumably clang, but not tested) is to mark your static data members with the "used" attribute: template
#AUTOMIZE 10.2 CODE#
If the compiler sees that code isn't referred to, even for static initialization with side effects, it can eliminate it, and I think that's the case in your example. Of course, I can get by using example 2, but it really got me curious why things break down like this.Įdit: same happens on Clang 8.0.1 (although I have to use the address-of-operator explicitly in assigning the function-pointers: Function f1 = &Type::get )Įdit: User 2b-t kindly made the examples available through for people to experiment with. Upon checking the symbol-table of instantiate.o with nm, it's confirmed that nothing at all has been instantiated. The above compiles but results in a linker-error. This should work, right? In order to instantiate InstantiateAll, each of the derived classes have to be instantiated. I thought I could factorize even further by defining a new class-template that depends on a parameter pack, which then derives from each of the types in the pack like so: This still works (because in order to initialize a pointer to a member, this member has to be instantiated), but when the number of enum-members is large, it will still be messy. Static constexpr Function f1 = Type::get Therefore, I tried making my life somewhat easier by grouping the members together in a new class, which itself depends on the template parameter and explicitly instantiate this class for each of the enum-values. However, in the real application, I have many function-templates and many more enum-members. Return static_cast(Value) // silly implementationĮxplicitly instantiate for each of the enum members.Īs mentioned before, the above compiles and links without issues. Only the declaration is visible -> needs to link against correct instantiation. I will first explain 2 working examples below, in order to explain what exactly my issue is (example 3):Ĭontains the function-template-declaration, not the implementation. While I'm able to do this, I run into problems trying to factorize the explicit instantiations. I want all other cpp-files to only see the declaration.
Because these templates depend on enum class members, I'm able to list all possible instantiations.
To reduce compile times in a template-heavy project, I'm trying to explicitly instantiate many templates in a separate compilation unit.
0 kommentar(er)
